Skip to main content

Safeguarding Research Integrity: Strategies to Combat Predatory and Hijacked Journals

By
In our pursuit of academic and professional excellence, it's vital to remain vigilant against predatory and hijacked journals, as well as other deceptive publishing practices. Predatory and hijacked journals are both fraudulent, employing different methods of deception within the academic publishing landscape. 

Predatory journals charge authors fees but lack proper peer review and editorial standards, compromising scholarly integrity. In contrast, hijacked journals imitate legitimate ones. For instance, the "Seybold Report" has an authentic website at https://seyboldreport.net/ and a counterfeit version at https://seyboldreport.org/. The hijacked version replicates the legitimate journal's style, editorial process, and ISSN, misleading authors and undermining research integrity. The clarivate's blog has more about hijacked journals.

These disreputable entities often disguise themselves as credible scholarly platforms, exploiting the eagerness of researchers and scholars to disseminate their work. Such practices compromise the integrity of our scientific and academic contributions, leading to the spread of unchecked and potentially misleading information. 

 To assist you in recognizing and avoiding these fraudulent journals, and to ensure that your valuable research makes a positive and genuine contribution to your field, I am sharing some vital tips. It's essential that we stay informed and uphold the credibility of our work. 

Here are some crucial tips: 

  • Verify Journal Credibility: Before submitting your work, always assess the credibility of a journal. Check for its impact factor, the credentials of the editorial board, and its presence in respected directories like the Directory of Open Access Journals (https://doaj.org/) or Scopus (https://www.scopus.com/). 

  • Be Wary of Unsolicited Invitations: Exercise caution with unsolicited emails that invite paper submissions, particularly if they demand quick submission or promise rapid publication. 

  • Research the Publisher: Examine the publisher's background thoroughly. A legitimate publisher will typically have a professional website, transparent contact details, and a clear publication process. 

  • Check for Peer Review Process: Confirm that the journal implements a robust peer review process. An absence of peer review is a significant warning sign. 

  • Avoid Paying Fees Upfront: Be skeptical of journals that request fees before accepting your work. Reputable journals usually charge fees only after acceptance.

  • Submit to Journals with No Publication Charges: Consider submitting your work to open-access, peer-reviewed, or Scopus-indexed journals managed by universities or institutions that do not require publication charges. This can help reduce the financial burden on authors. 

  • Seek Advice from Mentors: When in doubt, seek guidance from experienced colleagues or mentors in your field. 

  • Use Trusted Resources: Employ tools like Think. Check. Submit. (https://thinkchecksubmit.org/) to assist in identifying reliable journals. By adhering to these guidelines, you can safeguard yourself from predatory journals and ensure the integrity of your academic contributions.

By adhering to these guidelines, you can safeguard yourself from predatory journals and ensure the integrity of your academic contributions.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the Minimum Sample Size Requirement in PLS-SEM

By
On the Minimum Sample Size Requirement in PLS-SEM The minimum sample size required for conducting Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) is influenced by several factors. These factors include the complexity of the research model, the number of latent variables and indicators utilized, the magnitude of relationships between the latent variables, the desired level of statistical power, and the desired level of significance. Recently, Kock & Hadaya (2018) developed two formulas for determining the minimum sample size in PLS-SEM: the inverse square root method and the gamma exponential method. In these two formulas, the minimum sample size requirement in PLS-SEM depends on the minimum absolute significant path coefficient in the model, statistical power, and level of significant. In practice, researchers want to determine the minimum sample size before the data analysis and/or after the data analysis. A. Minimum sample size before data analysis According to Koc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Testing the Validity of Reflective and Formative Latent Variables in PLS-SEM Using WarpPLS

By
Testing the Validity of Reflective and Formative Latent Variables in PLS-SEM Using WarpPLS PLS-SEM is typically analyzed and interpreted in three sequential stages. The process begins with the analysis of the measurement model , which focuses on assessing the validity and reliability of the model. This stage is followed by the examination of model fit and quality indices . The final stage involves analyzing the structural model , which examines the relationships among latent variables used to address research hypotheses, including direct effects, indirect effects, and moderating effects. For guidance on the validity assessment of reflective latent variables using WarpPLS, refer to Amora (2021) . For the validity of formative latent variables, including both first-order and higher-order latent variables, consult Amora (2023) .   References: Amora, J. T. (2021). Convergent validity assessment in PLS-SEM: A loadings-driven approach. Data Analysis Perspectives Journal, 2(3), 1-6. h...
Post a Comment
Read more

Convergent validity assessment in PLS-SEM: A loadings-driven approach

By
Convergent validity assessment in PLS-SEM: A loadings-driven approach The article below explains how to conduct a convergent validity assessment in the context of structural equation modeling via partial least squares (PLS-SEM) using WarpPLS software. Amora, J. T. (2021).  Convergent validity assessment in PLS-SEM: A loadings-driven approach .  Data Analysis Perspectives Journal , 2(3), 1-6. Abstract: Assessment of convergent validity of latent variables is one of the steps in conducting structural equation modeling via partial least squares (PLS-SEM). In this paper, we illustrate such an assessment using a loadings-driven approach. The analysis employs WarpPLS, a leading PLS-SEM software tool. Download the PDF here :  Amora_2021_DAPJ_2_3_ConvergentValidity.pdf  Enjoy reading!
Post a Comment
Read more