Skip to main content
By
 Regression analysis versus Path analysis: What are the consequences if regression analysis is used instead of path analysis?

Regression analysis and path analysis are both statistical techniques used in research to understand the relationships between variables. However, they differ in their underlying assumptions and the types of questions they can answer.

Regression analysis is a statistical technique used to examine the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independent variables. It is generally used to make predictions about the value of the dependent variable based on the values of the independent variables. Regression analysis assumes that all variables are measured without error, and that there are no unmeasured variables that affect the relationship between the variables being examined.

Path analysis, on the other hand, is a more complex statistical technique that allows researchers to examine the direct and indirect effects of variables on each other. Path analysis uses structural equation modeling to estimate a series of regression equations simultaneously, allowing for the inclusion of multiple dependent and independent variables in a single model. Path analysis assumes that variables can be causally related to each other and allows for the testing of causal hypotheses about how variables are related to each other.

Using regression analysis instead of path analysis can result in a number of consequences, depending on the research question and the specific variables being examined. Some possible consequences include:

Limited understanding of causal relationships: Regression analysis cannot test causal relationships between variables, whereas path analysis allows for the testing of causal hypotheses. If the research question requires an understanding of causal relationships between variables, then regression analysis may not be sufficient.

Omitted variable bias: Regression analysis assumes that there are no unmeasured variables that affect the relationship between the variables being examined. If there are unmeasured variables that affect the relationship, then regression analysis may produce biased estimates of the relationship between the variables.

Failure to capture indirect effects: Regression analysis only examines the direct effects of variables on each other, whereas path analysis allows for the examination of both direct and indirect effects. If indirect effects are important for understanding the relationship between variables, then regression analysis may not provide a complete picture.

Inability to test complex models: Path analysis allows for the inclusion of multiple dependent and independent variables in a single model and can test more complex models than regression analysis. If the research question requires the testing of a complex model, then regression analysis may not be sufficient.

In summary, the consequences of using regression analysis instead of path analysis depend on the research question and the specific variables being examined. While regression analysis can be a useful tool in social science research, path analysis may be necessary in cases where a more complex understanding of the relationships between variables is required.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On the Minimum Sample Size Requirement in PLS-SEM

By
On the Minimum Sample Size Requirement in PLS-SEM The minimum sample size required for conducting Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) is influenced by several factors. These factors include the complexity of the research model, the number of latent variables and indicators utilized, the magnitude of relationships between the latent variables, the desired level of statistical power, and the desired level of significance. Recently, Kock & Hadaya (2018) developed two formulas for determining the minimum sample size in PLS-SEM: the inverse square root method and the gamma exponential method. In these two formulas, the minimum sample size requirement in PLS-SEM depends on the minimum absolute significant path coefficient in the model, statistical power, and level of significant. In practice, researchers want to determine the minimum sample size before the data analysis and/or after the data analysis. A. Minimum sample size before data analysis According to Koc...
Post a Comment
Read more

Testing the Validity of Reflective and Formative Latent Variables in PLS-SEM Using WarpPLS

By
Testing the Validity of Reflective and Formative Latent Variables in PLS-SEM Using WarpPLS PLS-SEM is typically analyzed and interpreted in three sequential stages. The process begins with the analysis of the measurement model , which focuses on assessing the validity and reliability of the model. This stage is followed by the examination of model fit and quality indices . The final stage involves analyzing the structural model , which examines the relationships among latent variables used to address research hypotheses, including direct effects, indirect effects, and moderating effects. For guidance on the validity assessment of reflective latent variables using WarpPLS, refer to Amora (2021) . For the validity of formative latent variables, including both first-order and higher-order latent variables, consult Amora (2023) .   References: Amora, J. T. (2021). Convergent validity assessment in PLS-SEM: A loadings-driven approach. Data Analysis Perspectives Journal, 2(3), 1-6. h...
Post a Comment
Read more

Convergent validity assessment in PLS-SEM: A loadings-driven approach

By
Convergent validity assessment in PLS-SEM: A loadings-driven approach The article below explains how to conduct a convergent validity assessment in the context of structural equation modeling via partial least squares (PLS-SEM) using WarpPLS software. Amora, J. T. (2021).  Convergent validity assessment in PLS-SEM: A loadings-driven approach .  Data Analysis Perspectives Journal , 2(3), 1-6. Abstract: Assessment of convergent validity of latent variables is one of the steps in conducting structural equation modeling via partial least squares (PLS-SEM). In this paper, we illustrate such an assessment using a loadings-driven approach. The analysis employs WarpPLS, a leading PLS-SEM software tool. Download the PDF here :  Amora_2021_DAPJ_2_3_ConvergentValidity.pdf  Enjoy reading!
Post a Comment
Read more